A Comparative Analysis of Pesantren and Formal School Curricula Based on Prevailing Government Regulations

Authors

  • Cecep Hiidayat Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Tarbiyah Fatahillah, Bogor, Indonesia
  • Harun Annasir Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Tarbiyah Fatahillah, Bogor, Indonesia

Keywords:

Curriculum, Pesantren, Formal school, Goverment Regulation, Comparative Analysis

Abstract

The curriculum serves as the cornerstone of the educational process, functioning as a guideline for learning implementation across all educational institutions. In the Indonesian context, pesantren (Islamic boarding schools) and formal schools possess distinct characteristics, yet both are officially recognized within the national education system. This study addresses the growing need to understand the similarities and differences between pesantren and formal school curricula as regulated by government policies, and explores how integration and synchronization can be achieved within the national education framework. This study analyzes the comparison between pesantren and formal school curricula based on existing government regulations, including Law No. 20 of 2003 on the National Education System, Government Regulation No. 55 of 2007 on Religious and Religious Education, and other curriculum implementation policies. A descriptive qualitative method with a document study approach was employed. The findings reveal that while similarities exist in basic curriculum structures such as competency achievement and learning assessment, significant differences emerge in educational goals, content, and pedagogical approaches. Pesantren emphasize religious dimensions and character development rooted in Islamic values, whereas formal schools orient more toward national competency standards. The study concludes that dialogue and curriculum integration are essential to building an equitable, adaptive, and socially responsive education system in Indonesia.

References

Abd. Rakhim Nanda, et al. (2021). Pedoman Evaluasi Kurikulum. In et. al. Khaeruddin (Ed.), Lembaga Pendidikan dan Pengembangan Aktivitas Instruksional (LP2AI) (Agustus 20, hal. 1–17). Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar. www.unismuh.ac.id

Ahmadi. (2013). Evaluasi Kurikulum 2013 Perspektif Balance. In M. Ulum (Ed.), Evaluasi Kurikulum 2013evaluasi Kurikulum 2013 (Cetakan Pe, hal. viii+95 hlm.; 14.5 x 21 cm). STAIN Po PRESS.

Arifai, A. (2018). Pengembangan Kurikulum Pesantren, Madrasah Dan Sekolah. Raudhah Proud To Be Professionals : Jurnal Tarbiyah Islamiyah, 3(2), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.48094/raudhah.v3i2.27

Dr. Wafi Ali Hajjaj, M. P. . (2020). Intrgrasi Kurikulum, Konsep, Model, dan Aplikasi (M. P. Agus Riyadi & Pemeriksa (ed.); September). Literasi Nusantara. www.penerbitlitnus.co.id Anggota

Hasibuan, R. M. (2013). Sistem Pendidikan Pondok Pesantren Salafiyah Di Era Modern (Pergumulan antara Tradisionalisme dan Modernisasi dalam Sistem Pendidikan Pondok Pesantren Syekh Muhammad Dahlan Aek Hayuara Sibuhuan Kabupaten Padang Lawas Provinsi Sumatera Utara). In Pekan Baru: Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau. uri:%09http://repository.uin-suska.ac.id/id/eprint/2538%0A

Heryadi, J. (2023). Integrasi Kurikulum Sekolah Formal Ke Dalam Kurikilum Pesantren (Studi Kasus Di Madrasah Aliyah Pesantren Modern Daarul ’Uluum Lido Bogor). Al Kaff, 1(5), 440–457.

Ijudin, R. (2021). E-Book Strategi Pengembangan Pendidikan Pesantren (T. Hidayati (ed.); Pertama, hal. 1–277). Penerbit CV. Pena Persada. penapersada.com

Jejen Musfah, Rusydi Zakaria, Ahmad Sofyan, Wahdi Sayuti, K. R., & Fauzan, M. (2019). Model Integrasi Kurikulum Sekolah Berbasis Pesantren (Sbp) Di Indonesia. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(1), 1–14. http://scioteca.caf.com/bitstream/handle/123456789/1091/RED2017-Eng-8ene.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005%0Ahttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/305320484_sistem_pembetungan_terpusat_strategi_melestari

Kamal, F. (2020). View of Model Pembelajaran Sorogan Dan Bandongan Dalam Tradisi Pondok Pesantren.pdf. Paramuribi, 3(2615–5680), 1–26.

Khaerudin. (2022). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran Pesantren. In M. A. Dr. Amiroh (Ed.), TRUSSMEDIA GRAFIKA (Desember 2, Nomor 1). Trussmedia Grafika. http://www.trussmediagrafika.com/

Kusuma, M. G. (2024). O f a h. 5, 55–73.

Luthfi, et al. (2022). Evaluasi Kurikulum. In 2022 (Ed.), Evaluasi Kurikulum Catatan Mahaiswa PAI UIN Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Temanggung (Cetakan Pe, Vol. 2, Nomor 3, hal. 410–415). Akademia Pustaka. https://doi.org/10.31004/anthor.v2i3.160

Mei Nuri Hafidha Sari, Ewiniarti Hawa, Febby Aulia Sari, M. I. (2024). Perkembangan Pendidikan Islam di Indonesia Pada Era Reformasi. LSEDU, 2(3026–4782), 127–133. https://doi.org/10.59966/isedu.v2i2.1516

Peraturan Pemerintah. (2019). Nomor 18 Tahun 2019 Tentang Pesantren. In Lembaran Negara RI (Vol. 1, Nomor 006344).

Permendikbud No 24. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 24 Tahun 2016 Tentang Kompetensi Inti Dan Kompetensi Dasar Pelajaran Pada Kurikulum 2013. In Jakarta (Vol. 2025).

Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2007). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 55 Tahun 2007. In Sekretariat Negara (Vol. 7, Nomor 3).

RI, K. A. (2015). Keputusan Direktur Jenderal Pendidikan Islam Nomor 6843 Tahun 2015. Direktorat Pendidikan Diniyah Dan Pondok Pesantren Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Islam.

Sayangan, Y. V., Una, L. M., & Beku, V. Y. (2024). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Sekolah Dasar pada Pembelajaran IPAS. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 14(3), 757–766.

Sobali, L. (2023). Evaluasi kurikulum terintegrasi antara pondok pesantren dan madrasah. Oasis, 8(1), 49–61. https://www.syekhnurjati.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/oasis

Zaini, M. (2019). Manajemen Kurikulum Terintegrasi. In A. Wahib (Ed.), PUSTAKA ILMU GRUP (2020 ed., Vol. 11, Nomor 1, hal. 1–14). Griya Larasati. http://scioteca.caf.com/bitstream/handle/123456789/1091/RED2017-Eng-8ene.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005%0Ahttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/305320484_Sistem_Pembetungan_Terpusat_Strategi_Melestari

Freire, Paulo. "Cultural action and conscientization." Harvard educational review 40.3 (1970): 452-477.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-14

Issue

Section

Articles