The dynamics of the scavenger profession: Economic motivation, social integration, and sustainability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59005/alkasb.v4i2.996Keywords:
Scavenger, Rational Choice Theory, Circular Economy, Informal Sector, Social IntegrationAbstract
Indonesia’s waste management crisis, being one of the world’s largest contributors of solid waste, highlights the strategic importance of the informal sector, particularly scavengers, who supply more than 80% of recyclable materials yet continue to face social stigma and systemic marginalization. This study examines the motivation and sustainability of the scavenger profession at the Angsanah Landfill (TPA) in Pamekasan, a distinctive context where scavengers experience full social integration without discrimination. Guided by Rational Choice Theory and Economic Behavior Theory, this research adopts a qualitative phenomenological approach. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with seven active scavengers, landfill managers, and village authorities, supported by field observation and documentation. The findings show that scavengers choose this occupation based on rational economic considerations; the prospect of relatively high earnings (up to IDR 2.8 million per month), low entry barriers, and flexible working hours. Socially, they benefit from strong community integration and the absence of negative stigma, which contrasts sharply with conditions commonly reported in major urban landfills. Despite these advantages, the long-term sustainability of the profession is threatened by increasing upstream waste-sorting initiatives, which significantly reduce the volume of recyclable waste that reaches the landfill. The study calls for policy interventions aimed at formalizing scavenger organizations through cooperatives, strengthening social protection, and integrating scavengers into circular economy frameworks, while considering the unique socio-cultural context of local communities to ensure inclusive and sustainable waste governance.
References
Achjar, K. A. H., Rusliyadi, M., Zaenurrosyid, A., Rumata, N. A., Nirwana, I., & Abadi, A. (2023). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Panduan Praktis untuk Analisis Data Kualitatif dan Studi Kasus. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
Aeni, N. (2019). Pengambilan Keputusan Menjadi Pekerja Migran Indonesia Perempuan. Jurnal Litbang: Media Informasi Penelitian, Pengembangan Dan IPTEK, 15(2), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.33658/jl.v15i2.151
Angelia, D. (2022). 7 Negara Kontributor Sampah Plastik Terbanyak di Laut, Bagaimana dengan Indonesia? - GoodStats. https://goodstats.id/article/7-negara-kontributor-sampah-plastik-terbanyak-di-laut-bagaimana-dengan-indonesia-wijwv
Ayuna, R. S. Q., Ramadhita, N., Pratiwi, A. K., & Sagita, D. D. (2022). Fenomenologi Adversity Quotient Pemulung Tempat Pengolahan Sampah Terpadu (TPST) Bantargebang. Jurnal Mahasiswa BK An-Nur: Berbeda, Bermakna, Mulia, 8(3), 164–177.
Barakati, K. P. (2021). Keterlibatan Pemulung dalam Pengurangan Timbulan Sampah dan Risiko Lingkungan di TPS Jalan Bugis, Kecamatan Tanjung Priok, Jakarta Utara. 2.
Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Gray, D. (Eds.). (2017). Collecting Qualitative Data: A Practical Guide to Textual, Media and Virtual Techniques. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107295094
Budiman, A. (2023, November 1). Pakar: Pemulung Perlu Dintegrasikan ke Sektor Penanggulangan Sampah Formal. VOA Indonesia. https://www.voaindonesia.com/a/pakar-pemulung-perlu-dintegrasikan-ke-sektor-penanggulangan-sampah-formal/7334441.html
De Jaegher, H., & Froese, T. (2009). On the Role of Social Interaction in Individual Agency. Adaptive Behavior, 17(5), 444–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712309343822
Flick, U. (2017). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Collection. 1–736.
Handayani, R., Syapsan, S., & Ekwarso, H. (2020). Analisis Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Tenaga Kerja Perempuan Bekerja Di Sektor Informal Di Kota Pekanbaru. Akrab Juara : Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 5(4), 90–106.
Harrington, A., Marshall, B. L., Muller, H.-P., & Müller, H.-P. (2006). Encyclopedia of Social Theory. Psychology Press.
Hashimov, E. (2015). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook and The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers: Matthew B. Miles, A. Michael Huberman, and Johnny Saldaña. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2014. 381 pp. Johnny Saldaña. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2013. 303 pp. Technical Communication Quarterly, 24(1), 109–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2015.975966
Huzaemah, S. (2020). Sampah Adalah Berkah; Studi Pola Kehidupan Sosial Ekonomi Pemulung Di Sekitaran Tempat Pembuangan Ahir (TPA) Piyungan. Islamic Management and Empowerment Journal, 2(1), 81–92.
Jefferson, M. (2018). Behavioural Economics: A Very Short Introduction (Michelle Baddeley, Ed.). Oxford University Press.
Kadir, A. (2023). PENAMPUNGAN SAMPAH ANTANG (Studi kasus di Kecamatan Manggala Kelurahan Tamangapa Kota Makassar).
Kamaratih, D., & Alamanda, K. P. (2019). Orientasi Masa Depan Remaja Pemulung Di Samarinda. Personifikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Psikologi, 10(1), 53–70.
LCDI. (2023, March 7). Darurat Sampah di Indonesia – LCDI. https://lcdi-indonesia.id/2023/03/07/darurat-sampah-di-indonesia
Marsden, P. V. (2005). The Sociology of James S. Coleman. Annual Review of Sociology, 31(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.31.041304.122209
Menteri LHK. (2023). Hari Peduli Sampah Nasional 2023. https://sipsn.menlhk.go.id/sipsn/upload/produkhukum/ph__SE_1MENLHKPSLB3PLB_012023_file_1675173148358.pdf
Nim, A. (2015). Faktor Pendorong Dan Penarik Pemulung di Kecamatan Pontianak Tenggara. SOCIOLOGIQUE, Jurnal Sosiologi, 3(3).
Nuryana, A., Pawito, P., & Utari, P. (2019). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Kepada Suatu Pengertian Yang Mendalam Mengenai Konsep Fenomenologi. ENSAINS JOURNAL, 2(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.31848/ensains.v2i1.148
Pemkab Bone. (2023). Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Bone Nomor 9 Tahun 2023 Tentang Pengelolaan Sampah.
Ritzer, G. (2005). Teori Sosiologi Modern. Prenada Media.
Rizky Ilhami, Taqwaty Firdausijah, & Puspita Bunga Wiraloka. (2024). Kampanye Lingkungan Waste Management di SMAS Nasional Bandung dalam Mendukung Penguatan Poin SDGs Nomor 12. Jurnal Nusantara Berbakti, 2(4), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.59024/jnb.v2i4.435
Said, I. N., & Iskandar, D. D. (2020). Persepsi Peluang Kerja, Minat Dan Perilaku Wirausaha Mahasiswa: Analisis Dari Perspektif Theory Of Planned Behavior. AdBispreneur, 5(2), 201. https://doi.org/10.24198/adbispreneur.v5i2.27300
Statistika, B. P. (2022). Statistik Daerah Kabupaten Pamekasan Tahun 2021 (Issue 35280.2104). https://pamekasankab.bps.go.id/publication/download.html?nrbvfeve=ZjY2NDBjNzhhMzFkYzI0ZTA4ODRiYzU4&xzmn=aHR0cHM6Ly9wYW1la2FzYW5rYWIuYnBzLmdvLmlkL3B1YmxpY2F0aW9uLzIwMjEvMDkvMTAvZjY2NDBjNzhhMzFkYzI0ZTA4ODRiYzU4L3N0YXRpc3Rpay1kYWVyYWgta2FidXBhdGVuLXBhbWVrYXNhbi10YWh1bi0yMDIxLmh0bWw%3D&twoadfnoarfeauf=MjAyMy0wMi0xMCAxMDoxNzoxOA%3D%3D
Tampubolon, A. F. (2025). Analisis Keberlanjutan Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Sampah (PLTSa) Bantargebang dan Implikasinya terhadap Eksistensi Pemulung. http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/166672
Weyant, E. (2022). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th Edition: by John W. Creswell and J. David Creswell, Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 2018, $38.34, 304pp., ISBN: 978-1506386706. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 19(1–2), 54–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/15424065.2022.2046231
Whimster, S., & Lash, S. (2014). Max Weber, Rationality and Modernity. Routledge. https://api.taylorfrancis.com/content/books/mono/download?identifierName=doi&identifierValue=10.4324/9781315823935&type=googlepdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Alkasb: Journal of Islamic Economics

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



