Reviewer Process
The editor will first review submitted manuscripts. Afterward, they will be evaluated in the editorial office. Each article will be reviewed by at least two peer reviewers with expertise in areas relevant to the journal's focus. This process is conducted through double-masked review, where the identities of the authors and reviewers are kept confidential.
Manuscripts will be assessed by anonymous reviewers based on scientific contribution, originality, topic relevance, and quality of presentation. Comments from the reviewers will be forwarded to the corresponding author for follow-up. The editor will communicate the evaluation results as soon as possible, with a target timeframe of between 30 and 60 days. Each reviewer is given one week to complete their assessment from the date of receipt of the manuscript.
The final decision on whether or not an article will be accepted is made by the editorial team, based on input from the reviewers. The proposed decision will be discussed in an editorial board meeting before being communicated to the corresponding author.
Authors wishing to submit manuscripts must comply with the following requirements:
- Articles must be original and free from plagiarism.
- Articles must not have been previously published and must not be under review elsewhere.
