Publication Ethics

Assuq: International Journal of Islamic Economic Studies (AIJIES) is a peer-reviewed publication by the Master of Sharia Economics Program at the Postgraduate School of Universitas Annuqayah in Guluk-Guluk Sumenep, Indonesia, dedicated to maintaining the highest standards of publication ethics and actively preventing publication malpractice. This statement outlines the ethical responsibilities of all parties involved in the publishing of an article in this journal, which includes authors, the principal editor, associate editors, the editorial board, reviewers, and the publisher. This statement is rooted in the Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors provided by COPE. Our duty is to disseminate original and valuable work to the academic community in the best possible manner and according to the highest standards. We anticipate that the same standards will be upheld by our reviewers and authors. Integrity, originality, and equitable practices from authors, alongside fairness, objectivity, and confidentiality from editors and reviewers, are key principles that empower us to realize our objectives. Assuq: International Journal of Islamic Economic Studies (AIJIES) is dedicated to adhering to best practices in ethical issues, handling mistakes, and managing retractions while providing legal reviews when necessary.

Responsibilities of the Editor

Decisions on Publication 

The editors of Assuq: International Journal of Islamic Economic Studies (AIJIES) ensure that every manuscript submitted for publication is assessed through peer-review by at least two experts in the respective field. The Principal Editor holds the responsibility for determining which manuscripts will be published based on the validation of the work, its significance for researchers and readers, reviewers’ feedback, and any applicable legal standards regarding defamation, copyright violations, and plagiarism. The Editor may consult with other editors or reviewers when making these decisions.

Fair Treatment 

Editors assess submitted manuscripts solely based on their academic quality (importance, originality, validity of the study, clarity) and their relevance to the journal’s scope, without consideration of the authors’ race, gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity, citizenship, religious beliefs, political ideology, or institutional affiliation. Editing and publishing decisions are unaffected by external governmental policies or any other entities outside the journal itself. The Principal Editor has complete authority over all editorial content and its publication timing.

Confidentiality 

Editors and any editorial staff are prohibited from revealing any details regarding a submitted manuscript to anyone aside from the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisors, and the publisher, as may be appropriate.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest 

Editors will not utilize unpublished information provided in a submitted manuscript for their own research purposes without obtaining explicit written consent from the authors. Any privileged information or insights gained by editors through their handling of the manuscript will remain confidential and not be exploited for personal gain. Editors will withdraw from reviewing manuscripts in instances where they have conflicts of interest due to competitive, collaborative, or other associations with any of the authors, companies, or institutions related to the manuscripts; in such cases, they will request another editorial board member to manage the manuscript.

Addressing Unethical Behavior 

The editors, in conjunction with the publisher(s), are obligated to take appropriate actions when ethical complaints arise in connection with a submitted manuscript or a published article. Every reported instance of unethical publishing conduct will be investigated, even if it emerges years after publication.

Responsibilities of Authors 

Reporting Standards 

Authors of original research must provide a truthful account of the work conducted and the findings, along with an impartial discussion of the importance of the results. The manuscript should include enough detail and references to allow others to replicate the study. Review articles should be precise, impartial, and thorough, while editorial opinion or perspective pieces must be clearly marked as such. Fraudulent or knowingly incorrect statements are considered unethical behavior and are not acceptable.

Data access and retention 

Authors are requested to supply the raw data related to a paper for editorial evaluation and should be ready to provide public access. They should also be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time post-publication. 

Originality and plagiarism 

Authors must ensure that their writings are entirely original. If any work or words from others are utilized, they must be properly cited or quoted. Plagiarism manifests in various forms, including misrepresenting another's paper as one's own, copying or paraphrasing significant portions of another's work (without proper attribution), or claiming results from others' research. All forms of plagiarism are deemed unethical publishing practices and are not acceptable. Each manuscript will undergo a plagiarism check to verify the article's originality. Additionally, every submitted article should include a letter from the author(s) confirming that it is free from plagiarism. 

Multiple, redundant or concurrent publication 

Papers that describe essentially the same research should not appear in more than one journal or primary publication. Therefore, authors should refrain from submitting a manuscript that has already been published elsewhere. Simultaneous submission of a manuscript to multiple journals is unethical and unacceptable. 

Acknowledgment of sources 

Authors must ensure that they properly recognize the contributions of others and cite publications that have significantly influenced the nature of their work. Information obtained privately (through conversation, correspondence, or discussion with third parties) cannot be used or reported without the explicit written consent of the source. Authors should not utilize information acquired while providing confidential services, such as reviewing manuscripts or grant applications, unless they have obtained explicit written permission from the relevant authors.  

Authorship of the paper 

Authorship should be limited to individuals who have made substantial contributions to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported research. All individuals who have made significant contributions should be included as co-authors. Anyone who has contributed to major aspects of the research should be recognized or listed as contributors. The corresponding author must ensure that all co-authors have reviewed and approved the final version of the paper and consented to its submission for publication. 

Fundamental errors in published works 

If an author identifies a significant error or inaccuracy in their published work, it is the author’s responsibility to promptly inform the journal editor or publisher and collaborate with the editor to retract or correct the paper. Should the editor or publisher be alerted by a third party about a significant error in a published work, it is the author’s duty to quickly retract or rectify the paper or provide evidence to the editor demonstrating the correctness of the original work.

Disclosure of competing interests 

All authors must reveal in their manuscript any financial and personal connections with individuals or organizations that may be perceived as potentially influencing (bias) their work inappropriately. They should disclose all sources of financial support for conducting the research and/or preparing the article, as well as the involvement of the sponsor(s), if any, in the study's design; data collection, analysis, and interpretation; writing of the report; and the decision to submit the article for publication. If the funding source(s) did not participate in these activities, this must also be stated. 

Image integrity 

It is unacceptable to enhance, hide, relocate, remove, or introduce specific features in an image. Adjustments to brightness, contrast, or color balance are permissible as long as they do not obscure or eliminate any information from the original image. While it is acceptable to manipulate images for clarity, any manipulation for other reasons may be considered a violation of scientific ethics and will be addressed accordingly. Authors should adhere to any specific guidelines regarding graphical images set forth by the relevant journal, such as providing the original images as supplementary material with the article or depositing them in an appropriate repository.

Responsibilities of Reviewers 

Assisting with Editorial Choices 

Peer review aids the editor in making decisions regarding the publication and can also help the author improve their manuscript through communication during the editorial process. 

Timeliness 

Any reviewer chosen who believes they are not qualified to evaluate the research presented in a manuscript or who cannot provide a timely review should inform the editor and withdraw from the review process. 

Confidentiality 

All manuscripts received for evaluation must be regarded as confidential materials. They should not be shared or discussed with anyone unless authorized by the editor. 

Objectivity Standards 

Reviews should be performed impartially. It is inappropriate to criticize the author personally. Reviewers ought to clearly present their opinions supported by reasoning. 

Recognition of Sources 

Reviewers should point out any relevant published works that the authors have not mentioned. Any claim that a finding, derivation, or argument has been documented previously should include the appropriate citation. A reviewer should also notify the editor about any significant similarities or overlaps between the manuscript being reviewed and any other papers they are personally familiar with.